Interstate Fire & Casualty Company v. First Specialty Insurance Company
| Interstate Fire & Casualty Company |
| First Specialty Insurance Company |
| 2:2017cv01795 |
| August 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/28/2020 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Interstate's Motion for Summary Adjudication is GRANTED as to its claims that First Specialty owed the insured a duty to defend in Alstatt, Baker, Paradise Court and Wigwam Ranch. First Specialty's Motion is DENIED as to the same claims. Interstate's Motion for Summary Adjudication is GRANTED as to its claims that First Specialty owed the insured a duty to indemnify in Allred, Alstatt and Ceccarelli. First Specialty's Motion is DENIED as to the same claims. Interstate's Motion is DENIED as to its claims that First Specialty owed the insured a duty to indemnify in Paradise Court and Wigwam Ranch. First Specialty's Motion is DENIED as to Interstate's claim that First Specialty owed the insured a duty to indemnify in Paradise Court. First S pecialty's Motion is GRANTED as to Interstate's claim that First Specialty owed the insured a duty to indemnify in Wigwam Ranch. Interstate's Motion is GRANTED as to its claims for equitable contribution from First Specialty for Allred and Ceccarelli. Interstate's Motion is DENIED as to its equitable contribution claims for Alstatt, Baker, Paradise Court and Wigwam Ranch. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/14/2019 EXTENDING the deadline for Phase One Dispositive Motions to 5/17/2019. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/22/19 DENYING 34 Motion to Compel without prejudice and the hearing set for 2/27/19 is VACATED. Because the discovery deadline in this case for Phase One is 3/1/19, any renewed motion compel w ould be untimely, 31 . The parties are free to continue to engage in informal negotiations regarding discovery, but the right to seek enforcement by this court has concluded absent a schedule modification made by the district judge in this case. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/14/2018 ORDERING all Phase One fact discovery must be completed by 3/1/2019. The parties must engage in meaningful meet and confer efforts prior to filing dispositive motions. Dispositive moti ons concerning Phase One must be heard no later than 5/3/2019. The parties' memoranda of points and authorities in support of their motions for summary judgment as well as the oppositions to such motions, if any, may not exceed 30 pages and their reply briefs may not exceed 15 pages. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/24/18 DISMISSING Claims without prejudice pursuant to policies issued to L.A.R.K. Industries, Inc. dba Residential Design Services. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/18. The court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file the amended complaint at ECF No. 19 -1, with an answer to the complaint DUE within twenty-one (21) days. The court also GRANTS the requested ame ndment to the initial phase discovery scheduling order as follows: Initial Written and Document Discovery Completed by 7/30/2018. The court also VACATES the Status Conference set for 4/20/18 at 10:00 AM and SETS the Status Conference 7/19/2018 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/26/2018 ORDERING that the date to amend pleadings be EXTENDED from 11/30/2017 to 3/15/2018. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
12
INITIAL PHASE DISCOVERY SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/6/2017 ORDERING initial disclosures shall be completed by 12/15/2017. All initial written and document discovery shall be completed by 5/1/2018. Status Conference set for 4/20/2018 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Interstate Fire & Casualty Company v. First Specialty Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: First Specialty Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Interstate Fire & Casualty Company | |
| Represented By: | David Seth Blau |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
