Bradley v. Miller et al
| Christopher Lawrence Bradley |
| Jeffrey Miller, Kari Strawn, Arturo Reyes and Maryanne Gilliard |
| 2:2017cv01834 |
| September 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/30/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is REVOKED. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff and on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (cc: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/5/2018 ORDERING that plaintiff's tardy 14 objections to the already-adopted findings and recommendations are OVERRULED as untimely. Plaintiff's 18 Motion to Proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED AS MOOT, because plaintiff has already been granted in forma pauperis status on 10/27/2017, which continues automatically on appeal. No further motions will be entertained in this already-closed case. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/8/2017 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's 7 second amended complaint be dismissed without further leave to amend; the action be dismissed with prejudice; the Clerk of Court be directed to close the case; Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's; IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, discovery and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of those F & R's. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/27/2017 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP; Plaintiff's first amended complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend; within 28 days of this order, plaintiff shall file either a second amended complaint in compliance with this order or a request for voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
