Evans v. Suisun Police Department, et al.,
| Richard Anthony Evans |
| Suisun Police Department, Lisa Carlock, Stephen Brown and Bryan Hamilton |
| 2:2017cv01889 |
| September 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/21/2019 DENYING 18 , 21 and 23 pots-judgment motions. No further filings will be accepted in this matter. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
13
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 03/20/18 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and for lack of prosecution. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/16/2018 DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this case. District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. assigned to this case. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/11/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff to show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
