Smith Winston v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Angeleka M. Smith Winston |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2017cv01901 |
| September 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Allison Claire |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/1/18 GRANTING 23 Motion for Attorney Fees. The fees and expenses in the amount of $4,100.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/26/2018 DISMISSING CASE and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the APPROVAL of the Court, that the Commissioner of Social Security has agreed to a voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence four of 42:405(g). CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/19/18, ORDERING that the new due date for Defendant's motion for summary judgment is 7/3/2018. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/13/2018; Defendant to show cause in writing, within 14 days, why its failure to file a MSJ should not be deemed a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff's Motion. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER for first extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/1/18. Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file her Motion for Summary Judgment. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/20/2018 ORDERING that Plaintiff may have an extension of time to and including 4/18/2018 in which to file a Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendant may have an extension of time to 5/18/2018 to file an Opposition; any reply by Plaintiff is due by 6/8/2018. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/13/17 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and ORDERING the Clerk to serve scheduling order; within 14 days, plaintiff shall submit service documents to the USM and file a statement to the court regarding the submission; USM shall serve process within 60 days. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith Winston v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angeleka M. Smith Winston | |
| Represented By: | Steven Gilbert Rosales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Michael K. Marriott, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
