Bennett v. US Department of Justice et al
| Stacey A Bennett |
| U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Renown Regional Medical Center, Sierra Regional Spine Institute, James H. Olson, Sherri Micone, APN and CFA |
| 2:2017cv01903 |
| September 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/6/17 Recommending that this Action 4 , 1 be dismissed without prejudice. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/24/2017 DISMISSING 4 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint with leave to amend; Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of service of this order to file a Second Amended Complaint that complies with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/22/17: 1 Complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
