Blackman v. Tisher et al
Tony Blackman |
Francisch P. Tisher, Rodney G. Stone, Mark S. Boessenecker, Jerry Walkenhorst, Josh Walkenhorst, Kathleen Allison and M. Voong |
2:2017cv01926 |
September 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Napa |
Edmund F. Brennan |
John A. Mendez |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/5/2018 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/27/2018 ADOPTING the 10 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing of $400.00 in full within twenty-one (21) days from the date this order is served. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely comply will result in the dismissal of this action. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/2/2018 RECOMMENDING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP be denied and Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee of $400.00 in full within 21 days of any order adopting thes e findings and recommendations and admonished that failure to timely comply will result in the dismissal of this action. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.