Moohr v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| Robert B. Moohr |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 2:2017cv01936 |
| September 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| William B. Shubb |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/5/19 DISMISSING this action with prejudice with each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/12/19 ORDERING that the Dismissal with Prejudice shall be filed on or before March 13, 2019. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/14/2019 ORDERING that dispositional documents are to be filed not later than 30 days from the date of this order. All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are VACATED.(Washington, S) Modified on 1/15/2019 (Washington, S).
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/5/2018 REFERRING Case to Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for a settlement conference. Settlement Conference set on Thursday, 12/13/2018, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 8 (EFB), before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The parties are DIRECTED to submit confidential settlement conference statements via e-mail (EFBorders@caed.uscourts.gov) to chambers by 12:00 PM, (Noon) on 12/6/2018. Such statements are neither to be filed with the clerk nor served on opposing counsel. However, each party shall e-file a one page document entitled Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. The parties may agree, or not, to serve each oth er with the settlement statements. Each party is reminded of the requirement that it be represented in person at the settlement conference by a person able to dispose of the case or fully authorized to settle the matter at the settlement conference on any terms. See Local Rule 270. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/18/2018 MODIFYING the Status (Pretrial) Scheduling Order; The date for exchange of expert witness information is EXTENDED to 7/27/2018 and the date for rebuttal experts disclosure is EXTENDED to 8/10/2018. (Fabillaran, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moohr v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert B. Moohr | |
| Represented By: | Carole Bosch |
| Represented By: | Anthony S. Petru |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
