Nopens v. Polaris Industries, Inc.
| Paul Nopens |
| Polaris Industries, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv01985 |
| September 25, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Deborah Barnes |
| William B. Shubb |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/3/2018 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nopens v. Polaris Industries, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul Nopens | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Hall Gomez |
| Represented By: | Jon P. Jacobs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Polaris Industries, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ian Gordon Schuler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.