Law v. Austin et al
Carlos Gilbert Law |
Lori W. Austin, Naidoo, M. Osman, LI and Yee |
2:2017cv02060 |
October 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Allison Claire |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/8/2020 ADOPTING 43 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A) |
Filing 43 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/3/2020 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 42 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/25/2020 ADOPTING in full 41 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 30 defendants' Motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. Plaintiff is DECLARED a three-strike liti gant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status granted 8/27/2019, ECF No. 19 , is REVOKED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $400 fee in this action within 60 days, as a condition to proceed with this case. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 41 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/23/2020 GRANTING defendants' 40 motion to strike plaintiff's duplicate opposition and the Clerk shall strike plaintiff's 39 duplicate oppositio n. IT IS RECOMMENDED that defendants' 30 motion to revoke plaintiff's ifp status be granted; plaintiff be declared a three-strikes litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); plaintiff's ifp status granted 8/27/2019 be revoked; plaintiff be ordered to pay the fees in this action ($400) within 60 days after the district judge adopts these findings and recommendations, as a condition to further proceed with this case; and plaintiff be informed that failure to timely pay the above-noted fees will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/11/19 ORDERING plaintiff shall, on or before Friday, January 3, 2019, file and serve an opposition todefendants motion to revoke plaintiffs in forma pauperis status, OR file and serve a statement of non-opposition to defendants motion. Defendants may file and serve a reply within seven (7) days after service of plaintiffsopposition. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/6/2019 ADOPTING in FULL 32 Findings and Recommendations. Defendants Yee and Austin are DISMISSED from this case. (Reader, L) |
Filing 32 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/13/19 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a district judge to this action and RECOMMENDING that defendants Yee and Austin be dismissed from this case. F&R are submitted to District Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 20 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Carlos Gilbert Law signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/26/19. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.