Johnson v. Brixton Sherwood, LLC et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Brixton Sherwood, LLC and Starbucks Corporation |
| 2:2017cv02082 |
| October 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/7/19 DENYING 19 Motion to Stay. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
30
NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/15/18. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/12/2018 SUBSTITUTING attorney Cathy L. Arias in place of Shane Singh. Attorney Shane Singh terminated. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/25/2018 STAYING Case pending further order of the court. The parties are DIRECTED to promptly meet and confer to discuss settlement. If the parties have not been able to informally reach a set tlement within 45 days, they shall initiate participation in the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP). No later than 14 days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties shall jointly file their VDRP Completion Report (cc: VDRP). (York, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
