Johnson v. Raymond Investment Corporation et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Raymond Investment Corporation and Son Hoang Nguyen |
| 2:2017cv02102 |
| October 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/9/2018 STAYING Case except as set forth herein and VACATING all previously set deadlines and hearings pending further order of the court. The parties are DIRECTED to promptly meet and confer to discuss settlement of this action. If the parties have not been able to informally reach a settlement within 45 days, they shall initiate participation in the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program by contacting its administrator. No later than 14 days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties shall jointly file their VDRP Completion Report. (cc: VDRP Sacramento) (York, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/3/2018 GRANTING the stipulation to SET ASIDE the Clerk's 6 Entry of Default against Defendant SAU T. NGUYEN, sued herein as SON HOANG NGUYEN; and Defendant SAU T. NGUYEN, sued herein as SON HOANG NGUYEN, shall have ten days after the date of this order to file his answer to the complaint.(Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
