Rerich v. Ford Motor Company
| Christina Rerich |
| Ford Motor Company and Lithia Chevrolet of Redding |
| 2:2017cv02147 |
| October 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Craig M Kellison |
| John A Mendez |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Ariel Harman-Holmes on behalf of Christina Rerich. Attorney Harman-Holmes, Ariel added. (Harman-Holmes, Ariel) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS by Tionna Dolin. Attorney Dolin, Tionna added. (Dolin, Tionna) |
| Filing 21 CASE CLOSED (text only entry): pursuant to #20 Stipulation of Dismissal. CASE CLOSED. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 20 STIPULATION of DISMISSAL by Christina Rerich. (Santos, Rowena) |
Filing 19
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/3/2018 ORDERING that the action denominated 2:17-CV-02306 TLN KJN be REASSIGNED to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings; any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on the documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:17-CV-02306 JAM AC. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing 18
STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING ALL PROCEEDINGS AND DEADLINES signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/12/17. All scheduled hearings in this action are VACATED. CASE STAYED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Stay of All Proceedings and Deadlines by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER: Defendants Motion to Shorten Time is DENIED. ECF No. 15. Defendants Motion to Stay, ECF No. 14, remains set for hearing on January 16, 2018, with the regular briefing schedule. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY)(Vine, H) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to SHORTEN TIME re #14 Motion by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Johnson, Paul) Modified on 12/5/2017 (York, M). |
| Filing 14 MOTION to STAY by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I) (Johnson, Paul) Modified on 12/5/2017 (York, M). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE to State Court Clerk and Adverse Parties of Removal of Entire Action to Federal Court by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sabnis, Cheryl) Modified on 11/20/2017 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 12 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company.(Sabnis, Cheryl) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to REMAND to Sacramento County Superior Court by Christina Rerich. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Request for Judicial Order, #3 Declaration, #4 Proposed Order)(Santos, Rowena) Modified on 11/16/2017 (Becknal, R). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to DISMISS by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Paul R. Johnson, #3 Exhibit)(Sabnis, Cheryl) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Lithia Chevrolet of Redding * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Rowena Santos* *Strategic Legal Practices* *1840 Century Park East, Suite 430* *Los Angeles, CA 90067*. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Christina Rerich. Attorney Santos, Rowena added.(Santos, Rowena) |
|
Filing 7
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/31/17: The actions denominated 2:17-CV-02140 KJM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02145 KJM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02147 TLN CMK, 2:17-CV-02148 KJM-GGH, Case No. 2:17-CV-02151 MCE-DB, 2:17-cv-02153 JAM-KJN, and 2:17-CV-02158 TLN-CMK be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:17-CV-02140 JAM AC, 2:17-CV-02145 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02147 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02148 JAM AC,2:17-CV-02151 JAM-AC, 2:17-cv-02153 JAM-AC, and 2:17-CV-02158 JAM-AC.(Kaminski, H)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:17-cv-01987, 2:17-cv-02140, 2:17-cv-02145, 2:17-cv-02147, 2:17-cv-02148, 2:17-cv-02151, 2:17-cv-02153, 2:17-cv-02158 by Ford Motor Company. Attorney Johnson, Paul R. added. (Johnson, Paul) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 Jury Demand. (Sabnis, Cheryl) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for TRIAL by JURY by Ford Motor Company. (Sabnis, Cheryl) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sabnis, Cheryl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34201700218548 by Christina Rerich. Civil Filing Fee $400.00, Receipt #0972-7312821. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Ford's 10-k, #3 Exhibit C - Hugret Decl, #4 Exhibit D - SLP Excerpt, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sabnis, Cheryl) Modified on 10/16/2017 (Reader, L). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
