Dolan v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Megan Dolan
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 2:2017cv02148
Filed: October 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Referring Judge: Gregory G Hollows
2 Judge: John A Mendez
3 Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2018 OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA case number 2:18-cv-01005. (Robles, S)
February 6, 2018 Filing 15 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
February 6, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #15 Order served on Gillian Mellon NCAED. (Donati, J)
January 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/3/2018 ORDERING that the action denominated 2:17-CV-02306 TLN KJN be REASSIGNED to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings; any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on the documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:17-CV-02306 JAM AC. (Becknal, R)
December 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING ALL PROCEEDINGS AND DEADLINES signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/12/17. All scheduled hearings in this action are VACATED. CASE STAYED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 11, 2017 Filing 12 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Stay of All Proceedings and Deadlines by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul)
December 5, 2017 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: Defendants Motion to Shorten Time is DENIED. ECF No. 10. Defendants Motion to Stay, ECF No. 9, remains set for hearing on January 16, 2018, with the regular briefing schedule. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY)(Vine, H)
December 4, 2017 Filing 10 MOTION to SHORTEN TIME re #9 Motion by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Johnson, Paul) Modified on 12/5/2017 (York, M).
December 4, 2017 Filing 9 MOTION to STAY by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I) (Johnson, Paul) Modified on 12/5/2017 (York, M).
November 17, 2017 Filing 8 NOTICE to State Court Clerk and Adverse Parties of Removal of Entire Action to Federal Court by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sabnis, Cheryl) Modified on 11/20/2017 (Kaminski, H).
November 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/31/17: The actions denominated 2:17-CV-02140 KJM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02145 KJM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02147 TLN CMK, 2:17-CV-02148 KJM-GGH, Case No. 2:17-CV-02151 MCE-DB, 2:17-cv-02153 JAM-KJN, and 2:17-CV-02158 TLN-CMK be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:17-CV-02140 JAM AC, 2:17-CV-02145 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02147 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02148 JAM AC,2:17-CV-02151 JAM-AC, 2:17-cv-02153 JAM-AC, and 2:17-CV-02158 JAM-AC.(Kaminski, H)
October 26, 2017 Filing 6 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:17-cv-01987, 2:17-cv-02140, 2:17-cv-02145, 2:17-cv-02147, 2:17-cv-02148, 2:17-cv-02151, 2:17-cv-02153, 2:17-cv-02158 by Ford Motor Company. Attorney Johnson, Paul R. added. (Johnson, Paul)
October 16, 2017 Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/1/2018 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L)
October 16, 2017 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 Jury Demand, #1 Notice of Removal,. (Sabnis, Cheryl)
October 16, 2017 Filing 3 DEMAND for TRIAL by JURY by Ford Motor Company. (Sabnis, Cheryl)
October 16, 2017 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sabnis, Cheryl)
October 16, 2017 Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2017-00218546 by Megan Dolan. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7313443) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Ford's 10-k, #3 Exhibit C - Hugret Decl, #4 Exhibit D - SLP Excerpt, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sabnis, Cheryl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dolan v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Cheryl Sabnis
Represented By: Alexander Gerard Calfo
Represented By: Paul R. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Dolan
Represented By: Gillian Mellon, NCAED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?