Martin et al v. Ford Motor Company
Antone Martin and Michelle Martin |
Ford Motor Company and Geweke Company |
2:2017cv02158 |
October 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Craig M Kellison |
John A Mendez |
Troy L Nunley |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA case number 2:18-cv-01008. (Robles, S) |
Filing 22 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) |
Filing 21 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/3/2018 ORDERING that the action denominated 2:17-CV-02306 TLN KJN be REASSIGNED to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings; any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on the documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:17-CV-02306 JAM AC. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/12/2017 ORDERING all proceedings and deadlines in this action are STAYED. All scheduled hearings in this action are VACATED.(Washington, S) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Stay of All Proceedings and Deadlines by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: Defendants Motion to Shorten Time is DENIED. ECF No. 17. Defendants Motion to Stay, ECF No. 16, remains set for hearing on January 16, 2018, with the regular briefing schedule. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
Filing 17 MOTION to SHORTEN TIME re #16 Motion by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Johnson, Paul) Modified on 12/5/2017 (York, M). |
Filing 16 MOTION to STAY by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I) (Johnson, Paul) Modified on 12/5/2017 (York, M). |
Filing 15 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company.(O'Neill, Amy) |
Filing 14 MOTION to REMAND to Sacramento Superior Court by Antone Martin, Michelle Martin. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Proposed Order)(Santos, Rowena) Modified on 11/16/2017 (Becknal, R). |
Filing 13 MOTION to DISMISS by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Paul R. Johnson, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order)(O'Neill, Amy) Modified on 11/16/2017 (Becknal, R). |
Filing 12 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Geweke Company * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Rowena Santos* *Strategic Legal Practices* *1840 Century Park East, Suite 430* *Los Angeles, CA 90067*. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Michelle Martin, Antone Martin.(Santos, Rowena) |
Filing 10 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/31/17: The actions denominated 2:17-CV-02140 KJM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02145 KJM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02147 TLN CMK, 2:17-CV-02148 KJM-GGH, Case No. 2:17-CV-02151 MCE-DB, 2:17-cv-02153 JAM-KJN, and 2:17-CV-02158 TLN-CMK be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:17-CV-02140 JAM AC, 2:17-CV-02145 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02147 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02148 JAM AC,2:17-CV-02151 JAM-AC, 2:17-cv-02153 JAM-AC, and 2:17-CV-02158 JAM-AC. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:17-cv-01987, 2:17-cv-02140, 2:17-cv-02145, 2:17-cv-02147, 2:17-cv-02148, 2:17-cv-02151, 2:17-cv-02153, 2:17-cv-02158 by Ford Motor Company. Attorney Johnson, Paul R. added. (Johnson, Paul) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Rowena Santos on behalf of Antone Martin, Michelle Martin. Attorney Santos, Rowena added. (Santos, Rowena) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #5 Civil New Case Documents for TLN, #6 Notice - Other. (O'Neill, Amy) |
Filing 6 NOTICE to State Court Clerk and Adverse Parties of Removal of Entire Action to Federal Court by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(O'Neill, Amy) Modified on 10/19/2017 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
Filing 4 STATEMENT of Disclosure by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (O'Neill, Amy) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for TRIAL by JURY by Ford Motor Company. (O'Neill, Amy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Ford Motor Company (O'Neill, Amy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2017-00218513-CU-BC-GDS by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0972-7314103) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(O'Neill, Amy) Modified on 10/17/2017 (Reader, L). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.