Toole v. Roseville Police Department et al
| Sean K. Toole |
| Roseville Police Department and Ball |
| 2:2017cv02162 |
| October 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Placer |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/2/18 DIRECTING the clerk to randomly assign a district judge. District Judge Troy L. Nunley added. It is further RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:17-cv-2162-TLN-EFB.(Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/14/18 GRANTING 5 , 7 Motion to Proceed IFP. The complaint is dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/13/2017 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit the required trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/26/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of service of this order, either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a). (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
