Lauser v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Roberta Nuestro Lauser |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2017cv02165 |
| October 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/20/19 AWARDING Patricia L. McCabe attorney fees of $6,850.00 subject to the terms of 27 Stipulation. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/15/2019 REMANDING this action to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/14/19 EXTENDING the time for defendant to respond to the complaint until 3/18/2019. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/18/19 CONSTRUING 19 Motion for Extension as a Motion to accept late-filed brief and GRANTING the motion. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/7/19 ORDERING that 17 Stipulation for a further extension of time is not approved. Plaintiff shall file her brief forthwith along with a motion or stipulation to accept a late-filed brief. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER EXTENDING Scheduling dates signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/1/18. The time for Plaintiff to provide Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Remand, or to deliver new evidence with a Request for Voluntary Remand, shall be EXTENDED to and including 12/26/18, with all other scheduling dates to be continued accordingly, per the Case Management Order. Plaintiffs Reply Brief will be filed on or before 2/14/2019. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/26/2018 APPROVING 6 Substitution of Attorney and DIRECTING plaintiff, within 15 days of the date of this order, to submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/8/18 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on Plaintiff the scheduling order in social security cases; The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lauser v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roberta Nuestro Lauser | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
