Devils Garden Preservation Group et al v. U.S. Forest Service et al
| Devils Garden Preservation Group, Wilson Ranches and Green Valley Corporation |
| U.S. Forest Service and Amanda McAdams |
| 2:2017cv02185 |
| October 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Modoc |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Environmental Matters |
| 30 U.S.C. ยง 181 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 6/9/21 DISMISSING without prejudice this entire action. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/3/2020 DENYING 90 Motion to Compel and VACATING the 3/4/2020 Hearing. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/2/2020 GRANTING 88 Motion to Modify Schedule and ADOPTS the following schedule: Federal Defendants lodge supplemental administrative record in 90 days, Plaintiffs file motion to supp lement or complete record (if any) in 30 days, If not, Plaintiffs file opening motion for summary judgment in 30 days, Federal Defendants file combined cross-motion and response brief in 30 days, Defendant-Intervenors file combined cross-motion and response brief in 7 days, Plaintiffs file combined response and reply brief in 15 days, Federal Defendants file reply brief in 15 days, and Defendant-Intervenors file reply brief in 7 days. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/6/19 GRANTING Proposed Intervenors' Renewed Motion to Intervene (ECF No. 71 ) under Rule 24(a). The Clerk of Court shall enter Defendant-Intervenors Proposed Answer (ECF No. 18 -5) as an Answer on the ECF filing system in this case. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 6/17/19 LIFTING the Stay entered on 5/3/2018 and the parties shall file a joint status by 6/24/2019. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
60
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/2/2018 ORDERING that proceedings are STAYED pending completion of the administrative appeals and the parties shall submit a joint status report every 60 days until completion of the administrative appeals. The parties are further ORDERED to file a final joint status report and, if relevant, a request to lift the stay, within 20 days after conclusion of the administrative appeals. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
59
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/1/2018 GRANTING 53 Stipulated Motion to Amend Summary Judgment Schedule as follows: 5/3/18 deadline for Plaintiffs to file combined opposition to Defendants 9; cross-motions for summary judgment/reply in support of motion for summary judgment. 5/17/18 deadline for Federal Defendants to file a reply brief. 5/24/18 deadline for Proposed Defendant-Intervenors to file reply brief. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/17/2018 GRANTING the 32 Joint Motion to File Excess Pages; Plaintiffs are hereby granted leave to file their motion for summary judgment with Points and Authorities up to thirty (30) pages, and Defendants are hereby granted leave to file an opposition with Points and Authorities up to thirty (30) pages. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
