Williams-Turner v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Lonnie M. Williams-Turner |
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Maurice D. Robinson, County of Amador and K. Butler |
2:2017cv02252 |
October 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Garland E. Burrell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/14/2018 DISMISSING this action. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/10/2018 ADOPTING the 10 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 2 , 8 Motion to Proceed IFP are DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee of $400.00 in ful within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff is notified that failure to timely comply will result in the dismissal of this action. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/10/18 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's applications to proceed in forma pauperis 2 and 8 be denied. Plaintiff be directed to pay the full $400.00 filing fee f or this action within 21 days of any order adopting these findings and recommendations and be admonished that failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action. Motions 2 and 8 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.