Roberts v. Lizarraga

Petitioner: William Scott Roberts
Respondent: J. Lizarraga
Case Number: 2:2017cv02328
Filed: November 7, 2017
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 20, 2017 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/17/2017 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this action and RECOMMENDING petitioner's 1 application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed and this court decline to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Yin, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. Lizarraga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Scott Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. Lizarraga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?