Petrie et al v. General Electric Company et al
Larry Petrie and Charlotte Petrie |
General Electric Company, Novelis Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC, CBS Corporation and Crane Co. |
Crane Co. |
Crane Co., CBS Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC, General Electric Company and Novelis Corporation |
2:2017cv02329 |
November 7, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Troy L. Nunley |
Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/2/19 RELATING this action with member case 2:19-cv-01372-JAM-EFB. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 63 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/4/19 GRANTING 55 Motion to Substitute Party. Plaintiff Charlotte Petrie successor-in-interest to decedent Larry Petrie, is substituted for decedent in this cause of action as to the surviving personal injury claims of decedent's estate. Plaintiff may amend the caption of the complaint showing the substitution as is shown in the form attached to Plaintiff's proposed order as Exhibit B (ECF No. [55-2] at 9).(Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 52 STIPULATION and ORDER 51 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/6/2018 ORDERING all allegations, if any, related to exposure to asbestos on or after December 5, 1980 as to Defendant CRANE CO. are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. (Krueger, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.