United States of America v. Approximately $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| Approximately $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $13,020.00 in U.S. Currency |
| Alyssa Valley and Dean Daniels |
| 2:2017cv02358 |
| November 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/11/18 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations; Dean Alyssa Valley and Daniels are held in DEFAULT; judgment by default is ENTERED against any right, title, or interests of Alyssa Valley and Dean Daniels in Defendant currency referenced in case. All parties shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
13
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/9/18 recommending that Alyssa Valley and Dean Daniels be held in default. 12 Motion for Default Judgment be granted. F&R referred to Judge District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
5
APPLICATION AND ORDER for publication signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/14/17. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
