Johnson v. Kernan et al
Jerry C. Johnson |
Scott Kernan and Shawn Hatton |
2:2017cv02525 |
December 1, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Allison Claire |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/23/2024 RECOMMENDING that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Spichka, K.) |
Filing 59 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/16/2020 DENYING 57 Motion for Court Order. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 55 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/30/20 DENYING 50 Motion for Sanctions and DENYING 53 Motion for a court order. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/04/19 GRANTING 38 Motion to supplement petition. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioners habeas petition 1 , as supplemented 38 , within 60 days from the date of this order. Also, DENYING 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel and DENYING 43 petitioners request to reconsider the denial of his motion for sanctions and for injunctive relief. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/18/2019 DENYING petitioner's 37 motion for extension of time and DENYING petitioner's 39 Motion for sanctions and injunctive relief, without prejudice to petitioner pursuing his cl aims in a separate civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Respondent's 40 request for clarification is GRANTED and within 14 days, petitioner must advise the court whether he intends to file an amended petition or whether his intenti on was to supplement the original petition with the arguments in his motion to amend. Respondent's 40 request for a briefing schedule is GRANTED to the extent a briefing schedule will be set up on resolution of the status of petition. (Yin, K) |
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/8/2019 VACATING respondent's 22 motion to dismiss and DENYING as moot petitioner's 23 motion for a stay. Within 30 days, petitioner may file an amended petition. If petitioner fails to file an amended petition, the case will proceed on the original petition. (Yin, K) |
Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/20/18 ORDERING petitioners motion for a court order 32 is construed as a motion for leaveto file a supplemental reply in support of his motion to stay. Petitioners motion for leave to file a supplemental reply is granted and petitioner shallhave twenty-one days from service of this order to file a supplemental reply. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/9/2018 ORDERING Respondent to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to 23 Motion for Stay and Abeyance within 30 days from the date of this order; DENYING without prejudice 24 Request for Appointment of Counsel; ORDERING Petitioner to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to 22 Motion to Dismiss within 30 days of service of this order. If petitioner exhausts any claims in the California Supreme Court prior to this courts resolution of the pending motion, petitioner shall file a notice of exhaustion in this court. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/11/2018 DENYING without prejudice petitioner's 17 request for appointment of counsel.(Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.