Oganesyan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Zhanna Oganesyan
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2017cv02541
Filed: December 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/25/23 DENYING 29 Motion to hold defendant in contempt. (Licea Chavez, V)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/10/2022 EXTENDING 29 to 12/9/2022, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt.(Reader, L)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/5/20 GRANTING 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $11,531.25 in fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and upon receipt of the $11,531.25 award, counsel shall refund to plaintiff the sum of $6,500.00 previously awarded under the EAJA. (Kaminski, H)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/29/2019 GRANTING 22 Motion for Attorney Fees, in the amount of $6,500.00 and costs for $400.00 as authorized by 28:2412, 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Joint Stipulation. (Reader, L)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/28/19 GRANTING 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; The matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order; and The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
July 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/02/18 ORDERING that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 07/05/18.(Benson, A.)
June 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/27/18: The time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be extended from June 25, 2018 to June 28, 2018. (Kaminski, H)
May 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/30/18 ORDERING that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED from 5/24/18 to 6/25/18. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oganesyan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zhanna Oganesyan
Represented By: Stuart T. Barasch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Tina Naicker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?