Clark v. Fisher
| Jake Clark |
| Raythel Fisher, Jr. |
| 2:2017cv02574 |
| December 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Madera |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/29/2019 ADOPTING the Findings and Recommendations, filed 8/19/2019 (ECF No. 43 ), in full; DISMISSING the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ); and the Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
43
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/19/2019 RECOMMENDING the petition be dismissed and the District Court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/03/19 ORDERING the petitioner shall show cause in writing within 14 days, why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or to follow a court order pursuant to FRCP 41(b). The filing of an amended petition within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/28/19 GRANTING IN PART 36 Motion for Extension. Petitioner is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to file his Second Amended Complaint. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/22/2019 VACATING the 2/6/2019 findings and recommendations. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days in accordance with this order. The Clerk shall send petitioner a form application for writ of habeas corpus. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
33
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/6/2019 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/17/18 VACATING 31 Order as superfluous and DIRECTING plaintiff to file an amended petition within 30 days. Petitioner is advised that this order is not optional. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 09/14/18 ORDERING petitioner shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file his reply to petitioner's opposition to petitioner's stay and abeyance request. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/3/2018 ORDERING the petition is DISMISSED with leave to amend, within 30 days, in conformity with the issues addressed in this order; and petitioner's 21 request for a stay and abeyance is DENIED without prejudice, subject to the completion of the filing of an Amended Petition together with a new Rhines motion which addresses the preconditions for the granting of such a motion. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/02/18 ORDERING petitioner shall have to and including 8/28/18 to file a reply memorandum responding to respondent's opposition to petitioner's motion for stay and abeyance. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/12/2018 ORDERING Respondent to file opposition or statement of non-opposition to 21 Motion for Stay and Abeyance on or before 7/11/2018. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/10/2018 ORDERING 21 Brief in Opposition to 17 Motion to Dismiss is hereby redenominated as a Motion for Stay and Abeyance. Respondent to file either an Opposition to the Motion or a Statement of Non-Opposition within 30 days of the date of this Order. Petitioner to reply within 10 days of service of any Opposition, if any. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/23/2018 GRANTING 19 Motion for Extension file a motion for stay and abeyance. Thirty days from the date of this Order, petitioner shall file his motion for stay and abeyance. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/7/2018 VACATING 11 Motion to Proceed IFP. Petitioner's Motion to Proceed IFP is superfluous. (Fabillaran, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clark v. Fisher | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jake Clark | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Raythel Fisher, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Keith Paul Sager |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
