Vasquez v. Frauenheim
| Salvador Benjamin Vasquez |
| Scott Frauenheim |
| 2:2017cv02579 |
| October 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yolo |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/29/2022 ADOPTING 14 The Findings and Recommendations in full; This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/14/2022 ORDERING Clerk to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/06/22 ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this order, petitioner shall show cause why the stay of this action should not be lifted, and this action be dismissed based on petitioner's failure to comply with court orders and to diligently prosecute this action.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/2021 ORDERING that within thirty days from the date of this order, petitioner shall file a status report detailing his efforts to exhaust his state court remedies.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/5/2018 GRANTING petitioner's 7 motion to proceed IFP and petitioner's 2 motion for a stay and abeyance. Within thirty days from the date the California Supreme Court issues a final order resolving petitioner's unexhausted claims, petitioner is directed to file in this court a motion to lift the stay and motion to amend, as set forth in this order. The Clerk shall administratively terminate this action. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/13/2017 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/8/17. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vasquez v. Frauenheim | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Salvador Benjamin Vasquez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Scott Frauenheim | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
