Garcia v. Procter and Gamble Company
Brian Garcia |
Procter and Gamble Company |
2:2017cv02591 |
December 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/13/2021 RECOMMENDING that this case be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failures to prosecute and to comply with court orders. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Morrrison C. England, Jr.. Within 14 days of the service of the findings and recommendations, the parties may file written objections to the findings and recommendations with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 18 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/16/20 ORDERING that the initial Scheduling Conference is continued to 1/21/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. Within 14 days of the date of entry of this order plaintiff shall file a status report and show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with a court order. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/6/2020 DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to issue process. Within 14 days from the date of this order is filed, plaintiff is DIRECTED to supply the USM the necessary documents and shall with in 14 days thereafter, file a statement. The U.S. Marshal shall serve all process without prepayment of costs within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiff. The United States Marshal shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been served. If the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason, to effect service of process on defendant, the Marshal shall promptly report that fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned. (York, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/20/2019 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend, as provided herein. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. (York, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF RECUSAL signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/13/2017 ORDERING District Judge John A. Mendez RECUSES himself as the judge in this matter; Case reassigned to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; all future documents filed in this case shall reference case number: 2:17-CV-2591 MCE EFB PS. (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Garcia v. Procter and Gamble Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brian Garcia | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Procter and Gamble Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.