Landeros et al v. Schafer et al
Jennifer Landeros, B.M.L., J.J.L., D.F.L., T.D.L. and Deja Landeros |
Samuel Schafer, Steven Holstad, Daniel Coleman, Justin Parker, Patrick Scott, Jeremy Banks and City of Elk Grove |
2:2017cv02598 |
December 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 147 ORDER RE: BILL OF COSTS signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/21/22 ALLOWING costs of $6,804.10 will be allowed for defendants and are taxed against plaintiff. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 144 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/4/2022 DENYING 130 Plaintiffs' Motion for New Trial. (Kirksey Smith, K) |
Filing 138 ORDER re Plaintiffs' Request to Issue Subpoena 135 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/19/2022: At the request of counsel for plaintiff, at the 10/31/2022 hearing on plaintiffs' motion for new trial, the parties may call any w itnesses and present any evidence they wish to present. The court does not understand that it is necessary for it to authorize the issuance of subpoenas for specific witnesses. Accordingly, plaintiff's request for an "Order Granting Plain tiffs' Request to Issue Subpoena to Dr. Jason Tovar" is denied as moot. Likewise, if defendants' attorney really wishes to call plaintiff's attorney to testify regarding his prior knowledge of Dr. Tovar's fees and other representations made in his declaration, nothing in this Order prevents him from doing so. (Kirksey Smith, K) |
Filing 121 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 08/16/22 DEFERRING 116 Bill of Costs and 118 Objections until after any post-trial motions have been resolved.(Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 73 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/14/2022 DISMISSING Daniel Coleman with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party shall bear their own fees and costs associated with the aforementioned dismissed claims and damages and the dismissed named defendant.(Reader, L) |
Filing 67 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/20/2022 DENYING 62 Motion Bifurcate. (Coll, A) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/22/20 ORDERING that this case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on May 13, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. The settlement conference will be conducted by remote means and parties are required to appear by video conference. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than May 6, 2020. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/6/2018. (Washington, S) |
Filing 19 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/24/18. Initial disclosures shall be completed by 6/1/2018. All discovery shall be completed by 5/23/2019. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 6/28/2019 with any supplemental/rebuttal expert disclosures due by 8/2/2019. All expert discovery shall be completed by 8/28/2019. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 11/15/2019. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/23/2017 ORDERING that Jennifer Landeros be APPOINTED Guardian ad Litem for B.M.L., T.D.L., D.F.L.,and J.J.L. (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.