Johnson (Wadsworth) v. Slipper et al
| Rhonda Johnson (Wadsworth) |
| Keith Slipper, Claire Eve Geber, Bret R. Rossi, Benjamin R. Levinson, PLM Lender Services, Inc., Susan K. Smith and Rhonda Houska Johnson |
| 2:2017cv02654 |
| December 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/11/2018 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' 13 , 17 , 20 , 22 , 26 motions to dismiss be granted as to all defendants without leave to amend. All claims a gainst defendant Susan Smith be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's federal claims against all remaining defendants be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's state law claims against all remaining defendants be dismissed without prejudice . The Clerk of Court be ordered to close the case. IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 34 motion to reassign the case is DENIED. In light of these recommendations, all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and recommendations. Motions referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
