United States of America v. Approximately $19,600.00 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| Approximately $19,600.00 in U.S. Currency |
| 2:2017mc00160 |
| October 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/16/18. All parties will bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Pursuant to the Stipulation for Consent Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, the Court enters a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the above-described defendant currency. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/18/2018 EXTENDING Time to 7/22/2018, for the United States to file a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/24/2018 ORDERING that the deadline by which the U.S. shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain and indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 5/23/2018. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
6
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/20/18: The deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to April 23, 2018. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
4
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/05/17 ORDERING that time for the USA to File a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture is EXTENDED TO 02/22/18. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/25/2017 ORDERING the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 11/24/2017.(Washington, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $19,600.00 in U.S. Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Christopher Khasigian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Approximately $19,600.00 in U.S. Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
