Hernandez v. AFSCME California et al
| Lilana Hernandez |
| Xavier Becerra, Edmund G. Brown, Eric Banks, Mark Gregersen, AFSCME Local 3299, Arthur A. Krantz, Erich Shiners, AFSCME California, Priscilla Winslow and The Regents of the University of California |
| 2:2018at01413 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Lilana Hernandez for attorney Jonathan F. Mitchell to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-7844563) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT 9 to Complaint filed by Lilana Hernandez re #1 Complaint,,. (Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AFSCME California, AFSCME Local 3299, Eric Banks, Xavier Becerra, Edmund G. Brown, Mark Gregersen, Arthur A. Krantz, Erich Shiners, The Regents of the University of California, Priscilla Winslow by Lilana Hernandez. Attorney Mitchell, Jonathan added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7844524) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mitchell, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
