Humes v. Sac. Co. DHHS et al
| Jon Humes |
| Sac. Co. DHHS, City of Sacramento, State of California, Roseville Police Department, Daniel Hahn, Jerry Brown and Phelps |
| 2:2018cv00004 |
| January 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Trust Account of Jon Humes signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/28/2019. The Sheriff shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward t o the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/05/18 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of court, or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
