Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Lorena Angela Johnson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2018cv00005
Filed: January 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/29/2019 DENYING plaintiff's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING defendant's 33 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/6/2018 ORDERING Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before 12/17/2018. Plaintiff shall file any reply on or before 12/31/2018. All other deadlines are modified accordingly. (Washington, S)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/19/18 ORDERING that Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment by 12/03/18. Plaintiff shall file any reply by 12/17/18. All other deadlines are modified accordingly. (Benson, A.)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/19/2018 ORDERING that 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is DEEMED timely filed. The Commissioner's response will be due 11/19/2018. (Washington, S)
August 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/2/2018 ORDERING that plaintiff shall file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand on or before 9/4/2018. (Zignago, K.)
July 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 07/19/18 STRIKING 9 Motion to Remand and DENYING 11 Motion for Default Judgment. (Benson, A.)
June 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/4/2018 EXTENDING Time through 8/3/2018, for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand. (York, M)
January 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/8/18 granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on plaintiff scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorena Angela Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Sharon Lahey, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?