Humes v. Sacramento County
Jon Humes |
Sacramento County |
2:2018cv00015 |
January 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J. Newman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/9/2018 DENYING as moot 18 Motion to Proceed IFP; DENYING as unnecessary 19 Motion to Amend; and GRANTING Plaintiff 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 17 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/11/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/5/2018 ORDERING plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED; plaintiff is GRANTED 21 days to file an amended complaint that complies with the 5/4/2018 order; and plaintiff's 14 request for extension of time to submit ifp application in other cases is DENIED. (Yin, K) |
Filing 12 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jon Humes signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on Jon Humes. The Sheriff shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward t o the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Yin, K) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/05/18 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint and the certification required on the application form. The clerk of the court shall send to plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/10/18 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Humes v. Sacramento County | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jon Humes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sacramento County | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.