Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Sally Z. Ramos |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2018cv00060 |
| January 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/9/21 ORDERING that Plaintiff be awarded TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($2,000.00) in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d). (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 8/27/21 REVERSING the Comissioner's final decision and REMANDING CASE for a new hearing before a different administrative law judge. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 5/29/2020 DENYING 17 Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTING 20 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and AFFIRMING the Commissioner's final decision. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/9/2019 APPROVING 21 Stipulation. Plaintiff shall have a 30 day extension of time until 7/31/2019, in which to e-file her Reply to 20 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 5/15/19 EXTENDING the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment to 6/10/19. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/28/19. Plaintiff's time is EXTENDED to 4/4/2019, in which to file her Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before 5/3/2019. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 02/26/19 EXTENDING time until 03/25/19 for plaintiff to file Motion for Summary Judgment; defendant's Opposition is due 04/24/19. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/16/18 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Request to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on Plaintiff the scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sally Z. Ramos | |
| Represented By: | Harvey Peter Sackett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
