Lorretz v. USA Law Enforcement et al
Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz |
USA Law Enforcement, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Sacramento Police Dept. and Sacramento Sheriff Dept. |
2:2018cv00063 |
January 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Reader, L) |
Filing 14 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/29/2018 ORDERING that Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2 ) is GRANTED; and Plaintiff motion for recusal of the und ersigned (ECF No. 3 ) is DENIED; and RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's motion for recusal of the assigned district judge (ECF No. 3 ) be DENIED; Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without leave to amend; All pending motions be denied as moot; and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.