Storz Management Company et al v. Carey et al
| Storz Management Company and Storz Realty, Inc. |
| Andrew Carey and Mark Weiner |
| Mark Weiner and Andrew Carey |
| Storz Management Company and Storz Realty, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00068 |
| January 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
268
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 01/12/24 MODIFYING the 266 Order as follows: The cutoff of expert discovery shall be extended to 02/09/24, for the limited purpose of allowing Defendants to take the deposition of James Vaughn. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing
266
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 9/11/2023 MODIFYING its 2/22/2023, Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order 221 to extend the deadlines for the parties to disclose initial experts and produce reports to 11/2/2023; for the parties to disclose rebuttal experts and produce rebuttal reports by no later than 12/2/2023; and that all expert discovery shall be completed no later than 1/12/2024. All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orde rs, or other emergency applications, shall be filed on or before 3/22/2024 and shall be noticed for hearing before Judge Calabretta on 5/9/2024 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel are directed to refer to the local rules and Judge Calabretta's Standing Order regarding the requirements for noticing and opposing such motions on the Court's regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
264
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 09/06/23 EXTENDING the cutoff for fact discovery to 11/15/23, for the limited purpose of allowing Defendants to complete taking the PMK Depositions. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing
260
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/15/2023 DENYING plaintiff's 246 motion to compel and 247 amended motion for sanctions, and VACATING the 8/18/2023 hearing on plaintiff's motion. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
257
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/25/2023 CONTINUTING 246 Motion to Compel Hearing to 8/18/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Parties shall meet and confer in person, over Zoom, or telephonically by 8/4/2023, and the parties shall file either a withdrawal of the motion to compel or an updated Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement by 8/11/2023.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
245
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/20/2023 DENYING without prejudice defendants' 227 motion for protective order, DENYING without prejudice plaintiffs' 231 , 240 motion to compel, DENYING without prejudice plaintiffs' 232 , 239 motion for sanctions, and VACATING the 6/23/2023 hearing on the parties' motions. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
229
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/08/23 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 193 Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena; Plaintiffs' subpoena is limited to documents from 01/01/16 to present; within 14 days, the documents at issue shall be produced to defense counsel; within 14 days of defense counsel's receipt of the documents, defense counsel shall review the responsive documents, make any applicable confidentiality designations per the stipulated protective order, any relevant redactions for privacy or privilege, and produce the documents to plaintiffs, with a Rule 26 privilege log if applicable. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
225
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/23/23 DIRECTING plaintiffs' counsel shall determine an appropriate proposed temporal limitation, within 14 days of the date of this order. After plaintiffs' counsel has determined a proposed temporal limitation, the parties shall meet and confer with 14 days thereafter. Within 7 days of the parties' meet and confer, the parties shall file a supplemental Joint Statement not to exceed 6 pages.(Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing
189
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/8/22 ORDERING the parties to file a joint status report not later than 8/29/22. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
187
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 08/02/22 GRANTING 185 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Bryan P. Sugar, PHV for Heritage Funding Corporation,Bryan P. Sugar, PHV for Heritage Funding IV,Bryan P. Sugar, PHV for Storz Management Company,Bryan P. Sugar, PHV for Storz Realty, Inc.. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing
183
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/15/2022 GRANTS in part and DENIES Plaintiff's 165 Motion to Strike. The Court STRIKES Defendants' first and eleventh affirmative defense, Defendants Mark Weiner, Andrew Carey, Nancy Hug hes, and JoyKelly's twenty-second affirmative defense, andDefendants Monolith, LLC and Monolith Properties, Inc.'s twenty-third affirmative defense. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. The court also DENIES 169 Motion for Summary Judgment and 179 Motion for Appointment of Discovery Master. The parties shall file a joint status report not later than 60 days from the electronic filing date of this Order. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/18/2021 DENYING 113 Motion to Disqualify Defendant's Counsel and DENYING AS MOOT 38 Motion for Judgment. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
154
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/4/2021 GRANTING Plaintiffs' 143 Motion to Amend the Complaint and DENYING as MOOT Defendants' 22 Motion to Dismiss. The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file their amended complaint not later than fourteen (14) days from the electronic filing of this Order. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading no later than twenty-one (21) days after the filing of Plaintiffs' amended complaint. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/28/2021 DENYING 27 Motion for Sanctions. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/19/21 DENYING 8 plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/9/2021 DENYING 92 Motion for Reconsideration. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
138
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/15/2020 MODIFYING the 4/20/2020 Order (ECF Document No. 134 ) to allow Plaintiffs until 9/17/2020 to produce Mr. Pierini for his continued deposition as SMC's PMK.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
134
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/20/2020 MODIFYING its 3/12/2020 Order (ECF Document No. 130 ) to allow Plaintiffs until 6/17/2020 to produce Mr. Pierini for his continued deposition as SMC's PMK. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
130
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/12/20 EXTENDING date to 04/17/20 for Plaintiffs to produce James Pierini for his continued deposition as SMC's PMK. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/14/2020 GRANTING defendants' 116 Motion to Compel. Plaintiffs shall produce James Pierini for a continued deposition within 28 of the date of this order. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/29/19 DENYING 99 Motion to Compel without prejudice to renewal. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/25/19 DENYING MHP Holding, LLC's Motion to Quash 74 and responsive documents shall be produced within twenty-one days; DENYING Dudugian & Maxey, A Law Corporation's Motion to quash [ 75] and responsive documents shall be produced within twenty-one days; DENYING Diamond D. Construction, Inc.'s Motion to Quash 76 and responsive documents shall be produced within twenty-one days; DENYING Hunter and Renfro, LLP's Motion to quash 77 and responsive documents shall be produced within twenty-one days; DENYING Plaintiffs' Motion for terminating sanctions 78 . (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/25/2019 DENYING without prejudice to renewal 54 Motion for Sanctions as amended re 62 Motion for Sanctions and DENYING without prejudice 63 Request to Seal Documents. The 3/29/2019 h earing of plaintiffs' motion is VACATED. If plaintiffs elect to bring a renewed motion for sanctions, plaintiffs shall do so after complying with the Local Rules and the undersigned's Standard Information, specifically with respect to meet and confer obligations; and If plaintiffs elect to bring a renewed motion for sanctions, plaintiffs' motion shall be limited to 15 pages, defendants' opposition shall be limited to 15 pages, and plaintiffs' reply brief shall be limited to 10 pages. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/9/2018 GRANTING 44 Motion for Protective Order, and ORDERING that the subpoenaed text messages shall be produced to defendants' counsel. Within 14 days of receipt of the text messages by defendants' counsel, defendants shall produce the text messages and/or, if applicable, a privilege log to plaintiffs. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/11/2018. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/8/18 DENYING 16 Ex Parte Application for expedited discovery. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
