City of Lincoln v. County of Placer
| City of Lincoln |
| County of Placer |
| 2:2018cv00087 |
| January 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/23 ORDERING that the City's motion to strike is GRANTED IN PART as described in this order. The County's motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaim is DENIED IN PART as described in this order. The County's motion for summary judgment on its counterclaims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 7613(f)(1) and (g)(2) is GRANTED IN PART as described in this order. The County's motion for summary judgment on the City's claims is DENIED. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 5/19/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. This order resolves ECF Nos. 68 , 73 , 78 and 79 . (Kastilahn, A) (Main Document 104 replaced on 4/4/2023) (Donati, J).
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/27/2023 ORDERING that the 93 Ex Parte Applicaton for an extension of time and for an increase in page limits is GRANTED in PART as follows; The County may file a reply of up to twenty pages in response to the opposition 85 . The City of Lincoln is granted leave to file a responsive surreply of up to ten pages. The deadline for the County to file replies in support of its pending Motions for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 3/13/ 2023. The deadline for the City's surreply is 3/22/2023. The hearing on pending Motions for Summary Judgment 79 , 78 is VACATED and RESET for 3/31/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
83
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/23/23 AMENDING 64 Seventh Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order as follows: all dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other e mergency applications, shall be heard no later than 2/17/23. The County's 78 79 pending motions for summary judgment shall be heard no later than 3/31/23. The City may file it's oppositions to the County's motions for summary judgment on or before 2/10/23; and the County may file it's replies on or before 3/2/23. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/4/23 ORDERING that the City may file its Opposition to the County's Motion to Amend on or before 1/9/23. The County may file its Reply to the City's Opposition to the Motion to Amend on or before 1/20/23. The hearing for 73 the Motion to File Amended Answer and 68 the Motion to Strike is RESET to 3/10/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/12/22 ORDERING that the County may file its Opposition to the Motion to Strike on or before December 9, 2022. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
64
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/28/2022 MODIFYING the SIXTH Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order as follows: All Expert Discovery to be completed by 10/28/2022; Dispositive Motions to be heard by 02/17/2023. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/14/2022 GRANTING 46 Motion for Judgment on the pleadings with leave for the City to amend its equitable indemnity and equitable contribution claims. The court also GRANTS the County&# 039;s Motion for Judgment on the pleadings as to the City's claim for contribution under CERCLA section 113, without leave to amend. The court DENIES the City's procedurally flawed request for leave to amend to add a claim under the California Hazardous Substances Account Act. The City may renew this request by filing the proper motion. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/25/22 ORDERING that the City's June 7, 2022 expert disclosures and each expert report attached thereto, ECF 58, 58- 1, 58-2, 58-3 and 58-4, are hereby withdrawn and stricken from the official Court docket in this action. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/01/2022 MODIFYING the Fifth Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order as follows: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 6/7/2022; Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert Witnesses due by 08/22/2022; All Expert Discovery to be completed by 10/14/2022; and Dispositive Motions to be heard by 12/9/2022. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/14/22 re Remote Deposition Protocol. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/29/21 DENYING 33 Motion for Protective Order. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/06/21 re Document Authentication. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/7/2021 AMENDING 28 Fourth Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order as follows: Fact Discovery to be completed by 1/27/2022, Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 3/9/2022, Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert Witnesses due by 6/6/2022, Expert Discovery to be completed by 9/6/2022, and Dispositive Motions to be heard by 12/9/2022. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/2/20: The Parties agree to not dispute the authenticity of the documents identified by "Bates" numbers and enumerated herein. The Parties further stipulate to undertake a good faith effort to supplement the list of documents whose authenticity the Parties agree to not dispute. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
23
THIRD AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/8/2020 ORDERING that all discovery shall be completed by 4/30/2021. Designation of Expert Witnesses due not later than 6/9/2021 and rebuttal list of expe rt witnesses due by 9/8/2021. All expert discovery shall be completed by 12/8/2021. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 3/4/2022. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/5/2018 ORDERING Stipulated protections for privileged material and work product, Federal Rules of Evidence 502(d) APPROVED. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: City of Lincoln v. County of Placer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: City of Lincoln | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Thomas Orrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: County of Placer | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steven Warner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
