Sprague v. Phillips
| Jerome H. Sprague and Jerome H. Sprague Family Revocable Trust |
| Lloyd A Phillips |
| 2:2018cv00089 |
| January 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/26/2018 RECOMMENDING that 6 Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. Plaintiffs' complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiffs be advised that any future action or motion brought in this court, and deemed to be frivolous, may result in sanctions. The Clerk of Court be ordered to close this case. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. ORDERING that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this acti on are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and recommendations. With the exception of objections to the findings and recommendations and any non-frivolous motions for emergency relief, the court will not entertain or respond to any motions and other filings until the findings and recommendations are resolved. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Washington, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
