Ryan v. City of Lincoln, et al.,
| Richard J. Ryan |
| City of Lincoln, County of Placer, Toni Frayji and Frayji Design Group, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00096 |
| January 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Land Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/18/2019 DENYING 32 Motion to Alter or Amend Order, for failing to provide any grounds on whichthe court should alter or amend its prior order. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/18/19 ORDERING that within 14 days of this order plaintiff and the City of Lincoln shall file simultaneous supplemental briefs, not to exceed 10 pages addressing the effect of Knick on plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. Upon review of these briefs, the court will let the parties know if it requires further briefing or argument. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/5/2018 GRANTING 12 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice, and DECLINING to grant plaintiff Richard J. Ryan leave to amend any claims related to defendant City of Lincoln. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment on behalf of the City of Lincoln only, and this matter is to remain open as to the County of Placer. (Huang, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
