Johnson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| James Johnson |
| Experian Information Solutions Inc., Trans Union, LLC and Equifax, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00114 |
| January 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Siskiyou |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/29/2019 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/27/19 GRANTING 4 Motion to Proceed IFP; DENYING 6 Motion to Amend the Complaint as moot. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend, as provided herein. Plaintiff is GRANTED thirty days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/22/18 ORDERING plaintiff to file, within fourteen days of this order, a further affidavit which is dated and signed under penalty of perjury. The court will then resume consideration of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
