Le et al v. USA
Helen Le and Khang Ninh |
United States of America |
2:2018cv00203 |
January 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Yolo |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Troy L. Nunley |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/26/22 ORDERING that the court takes no action on 31 plaintiff Helen Le's letter, as this case is closed. Plaintiffs are informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/12/2018 DISMISSING Plaintiff's Complaint without leave to amend; Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED as moot. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J) |
Filing 12 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/30/18 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; the 05/02/18 hearing on the 10 Motion for Default Judgment is VACATED; RECOMMENDING that plaintiffs' 1 Com plaint be dismissed without leave to amend, that plaintiffs' 10 Motion for Default Judgment be denied as moot and this case closed. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A.) Modified on 4/30/2018 (Benson, A.). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.