Ortiz v. Baughman
Petitioner: Travis Michael Ortiz
Respondent: David Baughman and Kevin Sears
Case Number: 2:2018cv00255
Filed: February 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/9/2018 ORDERING that this court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability; and the Clerk of Court shall confirm that the record in this case has been transmitted to the Court of Appeals. (cc: USCA)(Washington, S)
June 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/15/18 ORDERING the instant habeas corpus action was closed on April 27, 2018. Since that time, petitioner has filed several documents in this case, notwithstanding the undersigneds May 7, 2018 or der again noting the limitations of this case and the options for petitioner to pursue a cognizable habeas or civil rights action. The court now informs petitioner that any further documents filed in this case will be disregarded and no further orders will issue. (Plummer, M) Modified on 6/18/2018 (Plummer, M).
May 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/04/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff, together with a copy of this order, a blank civil rights complaint and a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis used by prisoners in this district. Plaintiff may complete and file these documents to commence a new civil rights action. Any further documents filed in the instant habeas case will be ignored. (Plummer, M)
March 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/22/2018 ORDERING the 4 court's order filed 2/22/2018 is VACATED as unnecessary; petitioner's 5 request for appointment of counsel is DENIED as moot; and the Clerk shall randomly assign a district judge to this action. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice because premised on an unauthorized successive petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
February 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/22/2018 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ortiz v. Baughman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Travis Michael Ortiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Baughman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kevin Sears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?