Hall-Kanellis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Catherine Hall-Kanellis
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2018cv00301
Filed: February 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/10/2021 GRANTING 27 Motion for Attorney Fees. Counsel for plaintiff is awarded $12,075.00 in attorneys fees under § 406(b). The Commissioner shall certify that amount to be paid to counsel from the funds previously withheld for the payment of such fees, and Counsel for plaintiff is directed to remit to plaintiff the amount of $2,700.00 for EAJA fees previously paid to counsel by the Commissioner. (Reader, L)
May 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/1/19 AWARDING attorney fees under EAJA, in the amount of TWO-THOUSAND SEVEN-HUNDRED dollars ($2,700.00), subject to the terms of the stipulation. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/15/2019 GRANTING plaintiff's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING the Commissioner's 17 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration consistent with this order. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for plaintiff, and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/23/18 APPROVING a requested first extension of Plaintiff's time to file a reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. Plaintiff shall file her Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 10/24/18. (Coll, A)
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/21/18 EXTENDING defendant's time to file her summary judgment motion with the Court by 30 days to 9/26/18, and that all other scheduling dates set forth in the Court's Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly. (Becknal, R)
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/27/18. Plaintiff shall file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand on or before 7/27/2018. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall-Kanellis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catherine Hall-Kanellis
Represented By: Shellie Lott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Asim Modi, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?