Arzaga v. Santiago et al
| Daniel Jesus Arzaga |
| E. Santiago, G. Donna, Haluik, A. Victoriano and S. Pak |
| 2:2018cv00313 |
| February 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/20/2022 ADOPTING in FULL 119 Findings and Recommendations. Defendant Santiago is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. ADOPTING in FULL 120 Findings and Recommendations. GRANTING 108 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by res judicata. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/4/2022 PARTIALLY GRANTING 121 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file and serve objections to the 119 Findings and Recommendations recommending dismissal of defendant Santiago within 30 days from the date of this order. (Perdue, C.)
|
|
Filing
120
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/27/22 RECOMMENDING that the 108 Motion for Judgment be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice as barred by res judicata. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing
119
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/14/22 RECOMMENDING that defendant Santiago be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/22/22 DENYING 116 plaintiff's motion. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/2022 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the 108 motion for summary judgment on the pleadings. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/2022 DENYING 103 Request to Change Case Caption and ORDERING Plaintiff to show cause why Defendant Santiago should not be dismissed within 30 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/16/21; Haluik ADOPTING 102 Findings and Recommendations in full DISMISSING defendants Haluik and Victoriano without prejudice; REFERRING matter back to assigned magistrate judge for all further proceedings. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
102
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/8/2021 RECOMMENDING defendants Haluik and Victoriano be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/22/2021 ORDERING Clerk to send plaintiff 1 USM-285 form and ORDERING Plaintiff to submit the completed USM-285 form within 30 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/27/21 DENYING 91 plaintiff's Motion. The clerk of court is directed to send plaintiff 2 blank USM-285 forms. Within thirty days, plaintiff shall submit the properly completed USM-285 forms required to effect service on defendants Haluik and A. Victoriano. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/6/2021 DENYING plaintiff's 85 motion. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/30/21 DISREGARDING 87 plaintiff's 7/26/21 notice of contact information. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff three USM-285 forms.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/09/21 DENYING 79 Motion to subpoena and PARTIALLY GRANTING 80 Motion to Vacate the Scheduling Order. Deadlines set in the scheduling order and revised scheduling order 48 , 64 are vaca ted, except that discovery as to defendants Gisler and Pak remains closed. Plaintiff is granted an additional 90 days from the date of this order to serve defendant E. Santiago, and to identify, locate and serve defendants Haluik, and April R. Victoriano. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/11/2021 GRANTING plaintiff an additional 90 days to serve process on defendants E. Santiago, Haluik, and A. Victoriano; and DENYING plaintiff's 70 motion filed 3/5/2021. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/27/2021 GRANTING 65 Motion for Continuance; DENYING 66 Motion to Compel; and DENYING without prejudice 67 Request for Subpoena Forms. Plaintiff may file a properly supported motion to compel further responses to his 8/15/2020 request for production of documents within 30 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/01/20 DENYING 57 Motion to stay discovery and PARTIALLY GRANTING 51 plaintiff's 9/14/20 motion. Plaintiff is granted thirty days in which to file a motion to compel further responses to his August 15, 2020 request for production of documents. Plaintiffs time for service of process on defendants Santiago, Haluik and Victoriano is extended for 120 days from the date of this order. The discovery deadline is extended until March 1, 2021, for the sole purposes described above. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before June 1, 2021. In all other respects, the July 2, 2020 scheduling order 48 remains in effect.. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/20/20 ORDERING that within 14 days, counsel for defendants shall respond to plaintiffs motion 57 as set forth above. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/21/2020 GRANTING 52 Application. Plaintiff's deposition may be taken via video conference, with the plaintiff, the deposition reporter, and defense counsel in separate locations and such deposition testimony shall be admissible the same as other depositions. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/21/20 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff 3 USM-285 forms and instruction sheet to be completed and returned with the notice of submission of documents within 90 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/02/20 GRANTING 44 motion to opt out and the stay of this action is lifted. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/22/2020 GRANTING 37 Request by Defendants Gisler and Pak and ORDERING Defendants Gisler and Pak to respond to 35 Order by, and including, 6/1/2020. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/01/20 REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. The parties shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. The assigned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy within 30 days to schedule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/12/2020 ADOPTING in full 29 Findings and Recommendations. Defendants' 23 motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 11 in form a pauperis status is REVOKED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $400.00 filing fee within 21 days from the date of this order adopting the findings and recommendations. This matter is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
29
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/9/2019 RECOMMENDING 23 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's IFP Status be granted; 11 Plaintiff's IFP Status be revoked; and Plaintiff be ordered to pay the $40 0.00 filing fee within 21 days from the date the district court adopts the instant findings and recommendations and failure to timely pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of this action. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/18/2018 VACATING the 11 findings and recommendations filed 11/14/2018 and DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall complete and return the Notice of Amendment with the required documents. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Daniel Jesus Arzaga signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/14/18. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/14/2018 DIRECTING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case. Judge Kimberly J. Mueller assigned to this case. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/9/18. Old Case No. 1:18-cv-0185-BAM, New Case No. 2:18-cv-0313-KJN. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
