Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels v. TWM Wholesale, LLC et al
Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels |
TWM Wholesale, LLC, Tire & Wheel Master, Inc., Tire & Wheel Master, LLC, USA Wheel & Tire Outlet, Inc., Aslam Property, Inc., HB Commercial LLC, Nadeem Aslam and Ammad Hussain |
2:2018cv00339 |
February 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Morrison C. England |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/6/19 ORDERING that the case is stayed for 90 days. Plaintiff is allowed to file a First Amended Complaint during the pendency of the stay. Defendants' answer to the First Amended Complaint will not be due until 14 days after pendency of the stay. Plaintiff's Motion 18 , as well as Defendants' Motion 25 are both DENIED, without prejudice to refiling once the stay in this matter has been lifted. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 41 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/28/2019 EXTENDING discovery dates as follows: Fact discovery to be completed by 5/30/2019; Designation of experts due 6/30/2019; Supplemental list of expert witnesses due 7/30/2019; Joint Notice of Trial Readiness (if the parties do not intend to file dispositive motions) due 8/30/2019; Dispositive motions deadline 8/30/2019. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 39 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/30/2018 GRANTING 29 Notice of Request to Seal Documents. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 37 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/29/2018 GRANTING 30 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants Response to Plaintiffs Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Defendants Statement of Additional Undisputed Material F acts [ECF No. 28-1] is accepted as timely filed. On or before 12/18/2018, Plaintiff Mobile Hi-Tech Wheels may file an amended Reply in Support of Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) and amended Evidentiary Objections to Defendants Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 23 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/29/2018 GRANTING 22 Stipulated Request to extend briefing schedule re 18 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Opposition due 11/15/2018 and Reply due 11/29/2018. (Zignago, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.