Smith v. Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution
Plaintiff: Ricky Paul Smith
Defendant: Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution
Case Number: 2:2018cv00347
Filed: January 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/10/2019 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this action and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
May 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/7/2019 ORDERING, within 14 days, plaintiff shall either dismiss this action or file an amended complaint. If he fails to do so the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for plaintiffs failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute. (Yin, K)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/25/2019 ORDERING plaintiff's 12 motion requesting in forma pauperis forms is GRANTED; the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application; plaintiff's 11 , 13 motions to proc eed ifp are DENIED without prejudice; plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days a completed affidavit to proceed ifp; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)
June 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/31/18 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of court. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. Plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Plummer, M)
February 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/15/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, either the $350.00 filing fee plus the $50.00 administrative fee or a properly completed application to proceed IFP. (Henshaw, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricky Paul Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?