Brooks v. Lee et al
Plaintiff: Rodney Brooks
Defendant: S. Lee and E. Arnold
Case Number: 2:2018cv00374
Filed: February 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 4/10/2024 GRANTING 109 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to file objections to 108 Findings and Recommendations. (Huang, H)
March 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 108 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 3/13/2024 RECOMMENDING the 103 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and judgment be entered in their favor, and 104 Motion to Stay be denied. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days to the Findings and Recommendations. (Woodson, A)
November 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/14/2023 DENYING 100 Request to Reopen Discovery. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to 103 Motion for Summary Judgment within 30 days of this order's issuance. (Woodson, A)
July 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 07/10/2023 GRANTING Defendants' 96 Motion for Extension of Time and GRANTING-IN-PART the 89 Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Compel. Defendants may file a Motion to Compel and the Dispositive Motion deadline is EXTENDED to 9/29/2023. Plaintiff's 90 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Plaintiff must provide responses to Defendants' discovery request within 30 days of this order's entry. (Spichka, K.)
March 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 03/24/2023 GRANTING the 86 Motion for Extension of Time and EXTENDING the following deadlines: Discovery due by 05/08/2023 and Dispositive Motions due by 07/21/2023. (Spichka, K.)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 01/05/2023 GRANTING the 83 Motion for Extension of Time and MODIFYING the Scheduling Order as follows: Discovery due by 2/27/2023 and Dispositive Motions filed by 5/15/2023. (Spichka, K.)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/14/2022 GRANTING defendants' 77 motion and VACATING the 7/22/2022 settlement conference. (cc: DMC, I.T. Dept., ADR)(Yin, K)
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 05/20/22 ORDERING the Custodian to produce by Zoom video conference Rodney Brooks on 6/24/22 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian. (cc: I.T. Dept, Sacramento and DMC) (Plummer, M)
April 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 04/21/22 DENYING 69 Motion for Extension of Time. (Perdue, C.)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 4/08/22. The assigned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy within 30 days to schedule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. (Plummer, M)
July 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/8/2021 GRANTING defendant's 59 motion, and the court hereby confirms that it will screen plaintiff's first amended complaint in due course. (Yin, K)
June 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 06/08/2021 GRANTING 56 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 15 days from the date of entry of this order to file an Amended Complaint. (Rodriguez, E)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/1/2021 ADOPTING 54 The Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING IN PART 38 Defendant S. Lee's Motion to Dismiss, and all claims against him are DISMISSED; Defendant S. Lees Motion is DENIED in all other respects; and Plaintiff is GRANTED sixty days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 54 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/18/2021 RECOMMENDING 38 Motion to Dismiss be granted in part and all claims against defendant S. Lee be dismissed, defendant S. Lee's Motion be denied in all oth er respects; and Plaintiff be granted 60 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations to file an amended complaint. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days of service of these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/03/20 ORDERING that, within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition. (Plummer, M)
July 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/24/19 GRANTING Plaintiff's request 27 for an extension of time and plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to return the completed USM-285 form with new instructions for service on defendant Lee.(Becknal, R)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/25/2019 ADOPTING 21 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Arnold without prejudice. (Huang, H)
April 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/29/2019 RECOMMENDING Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Arnold be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
March 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Rodney Brooks signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/14/2019. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to t he Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
February 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/21/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff to file the application required by § 1915(a) within 30 days from the date of service of this order. If plaintiff continues to experience delay in obtaining his certified trust account statement, he may submit his application without it. (Henshaw, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks v. Lee et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?