Andrews v. Prestige Care, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Robin Andrews
Defendant: Prestige Care, Inc., Prestige Senior Living, LLC and Manteca Ventures ALF, LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv00378
Filed: February 16, 2018
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 AMENDED 32 ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT(AS AMENDED BY THE COURT) signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/17/2020. (Becknal, R)
July 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/13/2020 GRANTING 27 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/9/19 GRANTING stipulation to stay all deadlines, including trial, as set forth in the Court's Pre-Trial Scheduling Order 18 , pending approval of the settlement and, if no such approval is granted, then all of the deadlines, including trial, will be re-calendared based on the date of denial of the motion for preliminary approval. (Kaminski, H)
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/6/18. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff may file the First Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit 1 to the Parties' Joint Stipulation within seven (7) days of the Court& #039;s entry of this Order; and (2) Defendants' responsive pleading in this action is due 21 days from service of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and they need not file a response to Plaintiff's initial Complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews v. Prestige Care, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin Andrews
Represented By: William J. Gorham, III
Represented By: Vladimir Joseph Kozina
Represented By: Nicholas John Scardigli
Represented By: Robert Joshua Wasserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prestige Care, Inc.
Represented By: Diane Marie O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prestige Senior Living, LLC
Represented By: Diane Marie O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manteca Ventures ALF, LLC
Represented By: Diane Marie O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?