Holmes v. Starr et al
| Kevin Holmes |
| Melba Starr, C. Barber, N. Gaughan, V. Brunetti, J. Saelee, C. Hill, C. Molina, R. Thornton and L. Fernando |
| 2:2018cv00446 |
| February 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Allison Claire |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/9/20 ADOPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations. This action is dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/19/20 ORDERING the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Judge to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/14/2020 ORDERING plaintiff shall, within 30 days, complete and file the attached non-prisoner ifp application, which shall include plaintiff's current address. Failure of plaintiff to timely comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall send plaintiff, together with a copy of this order, a blank ifp application used by non-prisoners.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
