Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Comm. v. Comcast Cable Comm. Mgt., LLC
| Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission |
| Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC |
| 2:2018cv00500 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/26/2021, DISMISSING this Case with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, notwithstanding this dismissal herein. The clerk is directed to close these Actions, subject to any reopening as necessary. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 4/12/2021. Defendant Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC's Request for a copy of the audio recording and written transcript of post-settlement conference hearing 74 is GRANTED. The court authorizes delivery to counsel for Comcast in a confidential manner the following: (1) A copy of the entire audio recording, including the confidential and sealed portions, of the post-settlement conference hearing on February 24, 2021 (the "hearing"); and (2) A written transcript, including the confidential and sealed portions, of the hearing. Comcast shall pay all fees associated with the delivery of the recording and the transcript. (Cannarozzi, N)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/11/2021 ORDERING 65 Settlement Conference by ZOOM set for 2/24/2021 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. Confidential settlement conference statement by 2/10/2021, by email, and Participate in a Pre-Settlement Conference Call on 2/17/2021 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/7/2021 ORDERING Expert Witness Depositions by 3/12/2021. Bench Trial Reset for 5/11/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Pretrial Conference set for 3/29/2021 a t 01:30 PM before Senior Judge William B. Shubb, and Settlement Conference set for 2/24/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson, and Participate in a Pre-Settlement Conference Call on 2/17/2021 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson.(Reader, L) Modified on 1/8/2021 (Reader, L).
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PARTY CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 42 , 49 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/18/2020.(Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/21/2020 ORDERING deadlines as follows: Non-Expert Depositions to be completed by 10/1/2020, Hearing on Motions for Partial Summary Judgment shall be on 11/30/2020 at 1:30 PM, Settleme nt Conference set for 1/14/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan, Confidential Settlement Conference Statements due by 1/7/2021 at 12:00 PM, Pretrial Conference set for 2/1/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb, and Bench Trial set for 3/23/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATION and REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/19/20 ORDERING that the parties shall complete non-expert depositions by June 1, 2020. Expert disclosure shall remain per FRCP Rule 26 (90 days before trial) . The Court will hear the parties' motions for partial summary judgment on July 13, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall attend a judicial settlement conference before the Hon. Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge, in Courtroom 8, 13th Floor , and shall inform his courtroom deputy of the date and time the parties selected no later than 12:00 PM (Noon) on February 20, 2020. Pretrial Conference set for 9/14/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Bench Trial set for 11/10/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/24/2020 ORDERING that the parties shall complete non-expert depositions by 3/31/2020. The Court will hear the parties' motions for partial summary judgment on 4/20/2020 at 1:30 P M. Opening briefs are due 3/23/2020; opposition briefs are due 4/6/2020; and reply briefs are due 4/13/2020. Settlement Conference is set for 5/21/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Pretrial Conference is set for 6/8/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Bench Trial is set for 8/18/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/6/2020 ORDERING that plaintiff Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission may file a First Amended Complaint. Defendant shall file its Answer to the First Amended Complaint within twenty days after Plaintiff files the First Amended Complaint. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/11/2019. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/23/2019: A Status Conference is hereby set for 7/8/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. No later than 6/24/2019, the parties shall meet and confer and submit a Joint Status Report. (See document for further details.) (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/21/19 STAYING this lawsuit, with the exception of "category three" issues, pending the issuance of a written decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal in Comcast of Sacramento I, LLC, et al. v. Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission, et al., Case No. 2:16-CV-01264-WBS-EFB. The parties are DIRECTED to promptly notify this court upon receipt of the Ninth Circuit Decision and request the Court order a further status conference for this case. Case stayed. (Coll, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Comm. v. Comcast Cable Comm. Mgt., LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Alan Nelson |
| Represented By: | Harriet Ann Steiner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Scott M. McLeod |
| Represented By: | Jill B. Rowe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
